| |
|
|
| Introduction |
^
Top |
Manas Tiger Reserve in Assam was created in 1973 at
the time of launch of the Project Tiger in India. The Reserve area
falls in six districts, Kokrajhar,
Bongaigaon, Barpeta, Nalbari, Kamrup and Darrang. Barnadi Wildlife
Sanctuary is located in the buffer of the Reserve. Manas is located
at the confluence of Indian, Ethiopean and Indo-Chinese realms resulting
in the magnificient biodiversity.
It is situated on the northern bank of the Brahmaputra river. There
are numerous rivers criss-crossing the Reserve, namely, Sankosh,
Saralbangha, Hel, Tanali, Courang, Sidli (Bhor) Aio, Manas, Beki,
Pathimari, kaladia, Tihunala, Morapagaldia, Nala, Braalia, Pbornodi
and Dhansiri. Waterholes have also been created at Buraburijhar,
Makhibaha and Daulabil, in the core area.
The Reserve runs along the Indo-Bhutan international border, with
contiguous wildlife habitats in Bhutan. The river Manas flows from
the gorges of Bhutan and splits into two major streams as it enters
India. The peace and tranquility of the site, Mathanguri, is a gift
of nature in its finest form.
While the core-zone, the Manas National Park, is a pristine wildlife
habitat, the rest of the Reserve is a collection of eighteen Reserved
Forests intertwined with revenue villages. While traversing the
Reserve from West to East, one comes across sal forests, both virgin
and degraded, moist-deciduous forests, isolated patches of ever-green
forests, riverine forests, grasslands of both savannah and terai
types, and miscellaneous forests.
Manas habitat provides an excellent abode to the tiger as well as
prey species: Hog deer, Sambar, Swamp deer, Asiatic wild buffalo
and Gaur. These species migrate freely across the international
border.
|
| Conservation
History |
^
Top |
Manas
Tiger Reserve was created in 1973, with Manas Sanctuary as its
core.
Manas Sanctuary with an area of 360 sq. km., was created way back
in 1928. Prior to declaration of the sanctuary, the area was Reserved
Forest (R.F.) called Manas R.F. and North Kamrup R.F. The Raja of
Gauripur and the Cooch-Bihar Royal Family were using these areas
as a hunting preserve. The sanctuary was later extended by two successive
additions in 1951 and 1955 to 391 sq. km. by including the entire
North Kamrup R.F. and the Manas R.F. Later the Kahitama R.F., the
Kokilabari R.F. and the Panbari R.F. were added and the area was
declared
as Manas National Park in 1990.
|
| Census |
^
Top |
Tiger
population was estimated to be 89 during the 1997 tiger census.
|
| Forest
Types |
^
Top |
Sub-Himalayan
High Alluvial Semi-Evergreen Forests ,Eastern Valoor Type of Forests
,East Himalayan Moist Mixed Deciduous Forests ,Low Alluvial Savana
Woodland ,Assam Valley Semi-Evergreen Alluvial Grasslands .
Major
Flora
374
species of dicots and 139 spp. of Monocots are recorded from the Park.
The park is an abode for rare plants such as Reinwardia indica, Desmoduim
motoruim, Pueroria subspicota, Biden pilore, Exacum teres, Pygmaeoprema
herbacea, Chiloschhiosta junifera, Oplismenus megaphyllus, Magnifera
sylvetica etc.
Main
Species
Shorea
robusta, Artocarpus Chaplasha, Bauhinia sps., Bombax ceiba, Careya
arborea, Chukrasia tabularis, Dillenia pentagyna, Lagestroemia parviflora,
Leea aequata, Leea Crispa, Melastoma malbathricum, Oroxylum indicum,
Toona ciliata, Trewia nodiflora, Sterculia villosa, Bischofia javanica,
Callicarpa arboarea, Dendrocalamus bamiltonii, Duabanga grandiflora,
Holarrhaena antidysentrica, Mallotus phillippensis, Mukuna bracteata,
Pouzolzia zeylanica, Syzygium formosum, Terminalia bellarica, Zingibar
zecumber, Zizyphus mauritiana etc. and grasses Imperata Cylindrica,
Narenga porphyrocoma, Panicum sps., Saccharum arundinaceum, thysanolaena
maxima etc.
Major
Fauna
Main
Species
Capped
Langur, golden Langur, Assamese Macaque, Rhesus Macaque, Common Langur,
Slow Loris, Royal Bengal Tiger, Black Panther, Leopard Cat, Clouded
Leopard, Wild Cat, Golden Cat, Fishing Cat, Large Indian Civet, Small
Indian Civet, Common Palm Civet, Himalayan Palm Civet, Binturong,
Common Mongoose, Small Indian Mongoose, Dhole, Jackal, Indian Fox,
Red Fox, Himalayan Black Bear, Sloth Bear, Smooth Indian Otter, Yellow
Throated Materna, Chinese Badger, Yellow bellied Weasel, Common Otter,
Indian Pangolin, Bearded Sheathtailed Bat, Fulvous Fruit Bat, Short
nosed Fruit Bat, Greater Yellow Bat, Three Stripped Palm Squirrel,
Five Stripped Palm Squirrel, Malayan giant squirrel, Bay Bamboo Rat,
Little Indian Field Mouse, Indian Porcupine, Asiatic Elephant, The
Great Indian One Horned Rhinoceros, The Gaur, the Asiatic Water Buffalo,
Sambar, Hog Deer, Barking Deer, Swamp Deer, Spotted Deer, Wild Boar,
the Gangetic Dolphin.
Endangered Species
There
are 21 recorded endangered species of mammals. These are Capped Langur,
golden Langur, Slow Loris, Tiger, Black Panther, Leopard Cat, Clouded
Leopard, Golden Cat, Fishing Cat, Bear cat, Sloth Bear, Asian Elephant,
Indian Pangolin, one-horned rhinoceros, Asiatic Water Buffalo, Swamp
Deer, Particoloured Flying Squirrel, Hispid Hare and Gangetic Dolphin.
|
| Management |
^
Top |
Practices,
Achievements and Shortfalls
The
social unrest in Assam for more than a decade has caused a situation
in Manas, which demand entirely innovative and cautious management.
The fragile law and order situation has effected protection. There
had been several cases of killings, encounters, arson and looting,
abductions, snatching of arms and wireless equipment. In spite of
this, the staff is trying its best to control the situation as much
as possible.
Fire is used as a management tool to maintain grasslands. Manas management
is collaborating with local activist groups and making concerted efforts
to stop deer poaching for consumption during feasts by the rural as
well urban people.
There exist wide spread hostility towards Manas among the local people.
Such psyche is detrimental to conservation interests. Very few serious
attempts have been made to involve the people of the villages in the
management of the Tiger Reserve.Workshops were organised in 1996 and
1997 with active participation from the political executive, forest
officials, NGOs, and local representatives. But conclusions arrived
at in these gatherings are yet to be translated into field action.
|
| Special
Projects |
^
Top |
New Initiatives
Eco-development
Ecodevelopment
involves bringing qualitative and attitudinal changes in the lives
of people living in surrounding villages, and thereby securing overall
ecological well being. A humble beginning towards improving amenities
in these villages through ecodevelopment works, was made during 1996-97.
Medical aid, drinking water facilities and energy efficient chulahs
were provided to the village folk under the programme. Few environmental
awareness camps were organised.
Village Forest Protection Committees
So
far no Village Forest Protection Committee is functioning in the
area.
However, local groups such as Eco-Clubs and Manas Bandhu Groups
have been formed with active facilitation of Manas management.
These groups
are promoting wildlife awareness, concern towards protection of
flora & fauna, and involvement of people in the ecodevelopment
activities.
Protection Squads / Patrolling
Patrolling
parties from the interior beats and camps venture for patrolling on
routine basis. Other than this, there exist armed contingents at the
Directorate Headquarters at Barpeta Road and at the Range Headquarters
of Bansbari, Panbari and Bhuyanpara Ranges. These render additional
help in patrolling and protection as and when required.
Education and Awareness
Promoting
education and awareness has been the basic agenda of the Manas management
from the very inception. However, the process has been slow. High
priority is being accorded at present to the awareness programs and
involvement of NGOs. Activities like organizing nature camps, meeting,
processions, formation of eco-clubs, Manas Bandhu groups and organizing
exhibitions in schools, colleges and cultural gatherings like Bodo
Sahitya Sabha, are being taken up.
|
|
Constraints |
^
Top |
Human population
There
is only one forest village, Agrang, in the core of the Tiger Reserve.
As per the socio-economic survey conducted in 1992 for the Manas National
Park which is the core-zone for Manas Tiger Reserve, the population
of 57 surrounding villages (including one village in core) was reported
as 28,795 for 4,885 households. The population beyond these fringe
villages is also heavily dependent on the Reserve for income and energy
resources.
Human population growth
|
Year
|
Population
|
|
1971
1981
1991
|
17298
23037
28795
|
Livestock population
|
Year
|
Population
|
|
1971
1981
1991
|
15912
17280
20231
|
Encroachment
The eastern and western ranges of the park, Bhuyanpara and Panbari
respectively, are under constant threat from the teeming fringe population
trying to thrust into the park area. Habitable as well as arable land
is prized commodity among the poor tribal. About 15 sq. kms. of land
under the Panbari R.F. in the core-zone of the Tiger Reserve is under
encroachment since 1993.
Despite
repeated eviction operations, the area was forcibly re-encroached
almost immediately.
Grazing
Grazing is not a serious problem in Manas Tiger Reserve. However,
some areas under Kahitama, Narayanguri and Palsiguri beats and Bansbari
range are affected by grazing.
FIRE
Occasional man-made, uncontrolled fires occur which have an adverse
impact on the habitat.
Poaching of fauna and flora
The consumption of deer meat during feasts and gatherings is linked
with traditions in the immediate vicinity of Manas which includes
towns like Kokrajhar, Bijni, Manikpur, Sorbhog, Barpeta Road, Howly,
Bhawanipur etc. Few among the fringe village populace, indulge in
opportunistic poaching and sale of deer meat. In addition to this,
incidents of poaching elephants for tusks and rhinos for horns were
also reported on a higher side during 1992.
Illegal
felling of trees for firewood and timber often occurs by the river
sides. The main reason for such illegalities is non-availability of
alternative sources of livelihood.
Poaching
of wildlife
|
Year
|
Rhino
|
Elephant
|
Tiger
|
|
1991
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
|
1992
|
11
|
4
|
2
|
|
1993
|
22
|
3
|
2
|
|
1994
|
4
|
3
|
--
|
|
1995
|
1
|
5
|
1
|
|
1996
|
--
|
2
|
--
|
|
1997(up to 1.12.97)
|
--
|
1
|
--
|
|
Total
|
41
|
20
|
6
|
Criminals and Extremists
The social unrest in Assam for more than a decade as affected the
management of Reserve. There had been looting of arms and ammunition,
burning down buildings, bridges and culverts and killings. Criminal
elements made use of the situation to cause destruction of habitat,
poaching of animals, illegal felling of trees and encroachment.
Control of the Buffer
Buffer
is not under the unified control of the management of the Reserve.
It is controlled by six Divisional Forest Officers
|
| Conflicts |
^
Top |
Man-Animal
Cases
of livestock and poultry lifting, straying of tigers into nearby tea-gardens
and human habitations, and even mauling of human beings, were not
uncommon in 1970s and early 80s. It was reported that eleven persons
were killed between 1979-81 by a man-eating tiger in the vicinity
of Agrang beat of Manas. No compensation whatsoever has been paid
in these cases. On the other hand, there is also the record of several
aggressive retaliations by the villagers against the tiger. Even in
1976, a tigress was hacked to death by villagers near Bhuyanpara Range.
One sub-adult tiger was found dead, half burnt near Narayanpuri in
1979. In 1984, on and off, there had been reports of a tiger entering
cattle-sheds and poultry farms. However, proper reporting of such
cases was not done. There might have been unreported killings of problematic
animals by the villagers. Cases of killing tigers for bones have also
come to light in early 1990s. Two tigers were clubbed to death by
the villagers when they entered a fringe village and mauled several
people in 1993. There had been several cases of killing the tigers
seemingly due to on going social unrest.
|
| Action
Points |
^
Top |
Immediate
steps need to be taken to develop trust among fringe-villagers through
active involvement of local NGOs, teachers and students. The process
of formation of eco-clubs and village eco-development committees,
with representatives from women and weaker sections of the society,
may also develop the feeling of ownership and confidence among fringe-villagers.
|
|
|
 |