Kanha
Tiger Reserve, comprising parts of the Mandla & Balaghat
districts of Madhya Pradesh, and located in the "Maikal" hills of
the Satpuras, is internationally renowned for its rich floral and
faunal attributes.
The
Reserve is an excellent interspersion of the Dadars (flat hill
tops), grassy expanses, dense forests and riverine forests. It is
very rich in flora, largely due to the combination of landforms and
soil types, apart from the moist character of the region
The rich habitat diversity of the Reserve
supports a wide range of wildlife species along with innumerable
lesser life forms, and is the sanctum sanctorum of many typical
Central Indian fauna.
Besides
harbouring a viable population of the tiger, Kanha has distinguished
itself in saving the endangered hard ground barasingha from
extinction, and supporting the last world population of this deer
species
^
Top
Conservation
History
Kanha
Tiger Reserve is constituted on a "core-buffer" strategy. The entire
National Park area of 940 sq. km. is visualised as a "core zone",
free from all biotic disturbances. A buffer zone of 1009 sq. km.
surrounding the core is treated as a "multiple use area". The buffer
zone comprises almost 40 per cent of forest area and the rest is
constituted by revenue and private land. This zone is characterized
by an interspersion of revenue and forest lands, pock-marked with
numerous villages. Besides, the Phen Wildlife Sanctuary, a
satellitic micro-core of 110 sq. km., is also under the
administration of the Reserve Management. The significance of this
micro-core lies in the exchange of gene-pool and dispersal of
wildlife populations between the two conservation units. The buffer zone has been
notified by the state Government as a separate division and is under
the unified control of the
Reserve Management. Wildlife
conservation practices and ecodevelopment in the National Park,
Buffer Zone and Phen Wildlife Sanctuary are carried out under the
Management Plan for the year 2001-2002 to
2010-2011.
The
Reserve is a part of the Gondwana tract inhabited traditionally and
chiefly by the Gond and Baiga tribes, the latter confining
themselves largely to the upper valleys and dadars near the main
Maikal range. Information concerning the early history of these
forests prior to 1860 is extremely scanty. The villagers had free
access to cut and burn forest at will. The system of shifting
cultivation, locally called "Bewar" - prevailed almost unhindered
until 1870 on the hill slopes.
^
Top
Census
|
Animal |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
| |
|
KNP |
Phen |
KNP |
Phen |
KNP |
Phen |
KNP |
Phen |
KNP |
Phen |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Chital
| 21717 |
99 |
18102 |
107 |
9724 |
117 |
19800 |
177 |
20250 |
187 |
| Sambar
| 4346 |
21 |
3313 |
24 |
3516 |
23 |
3518 |
23 |
3598 |
25 |
| Barking deer
| 228 |
25 |
1117 |
30 |
977 |
49 |
1081 |
49 |
1130 |
51 |
| Nilgai
| - |
62 |
- |
54 |
- |
62 |
- |
63 |
- |
66 |
| Barasingha
| 366 |
- |
389 |
- |
322 |
- |
324 |
- |
332 |
- |
| Nilgai
| 62 |
- |
54 |
- |
62 |
- |
63 |
- |
66 |
- |
| Chausingha
| 114 |
2 |
99 |
- |
68 |
- |
69 |
- |
70 |
- |
| Blackbuck
| 13 |
- |
9 |
- |
3 |
- |
2 |
- |
2 |
- |
| Gaur
| 1230 |
15 |
1372 |
18 |
1090 |
13 |
1108 |
13 |
1190 |
13 |
| Wild boar
| 9292 |
295 |
9314 |
312 |
8293 |
244 |
8300 |
244 |
8448 |
244 |
| Sloth bear
| 53 |
13 |
59 |
12 |
59 |
19 |
59 |
21 |
68 |
21 |
| Langur
| 6550 |
443 |
6375 |
450 |
5652 |
752 |
5800 |
752 |
5844 |
752 |
| Wild dog
| 149 |
57 |
266 |
50 |
304 |
36 |
306 |
40 |
322 |
42 |
| Jackal
| 263 |
25 |
250 |
46 |
169 |
28 |
172 |
30 |
220 |
36 |
| Tiger
| 100 |
5 |
97 |
4 |
97 |
4 |
105 |
2 |
106 |
2 |
| Panther
| 72 |
9 |
62 |
8 |
62 |
8 |
70 |
8 |
71 |
10 |
^ Top
Forest Types
Technically the following forest types are
found in the Tiger Reserve:
Moist Peninsular Sal Forests (3 C/C2)
Southern Tropical
Moist Mixed Deciduous Forest (3 A/C 2a)
Southern Tropical Dry Deciduous Mixed Forest(5
A/C-3)
Major Flora
Main
Species
Sal, Saja, Lendia, Dhawa, Tendu, Palas, Bija,
Mahua, Aonla, Achar and Bamboo etc. Besides, there are many species
of climbers, forbs and grass.
Major Fauna
Main
Species
Mammals:
Chital , Sambar , Barasingha , Barking deer ,
Chousingha , Gaur , Langur , Wild pig , Jackal, Sloth bear, Wild
dog, Panther, Tiger .
Reptiles:
Python, Indian Cobra, Russell’s Viper, Indian
Krait, Common Rat Snake, Common Skink, Indian Monitor, Fan Throated
Lizard and Indian Garden Lizard etc.
Fishes:
Giant Danio, Common Rasbora, Mud Perches, Brown
Snakehead and Green Snakehead etc.
Birds:
The
Reserve supports around 300 species of birds.
^ Top
Management
Practices, Achievements
and Shortfalls
Si
nce the core zone of a Project Tiger area
should have the least human interference, the Management envisages
exclusion of human interference in the form of human settlements,
domestic livestock, agriculture and other land use practices,
by the
gradual relocation of existing habitations. This is required to
safeguard the endangered gene-pool of flora and fauna. In the
past,
27 forest villages have been relocated at Government expense in
a phased manner from the core area of Kanha Tiger Reserve.
Although some extremist engineered activities
were reported outside the protected area in the adjoining districts
during 1990, the park area remained undisturbed subsequently due to
constant and strict vigil and the managerial activities were not
hampered. Intensive patrolling is now regularly carried out and
various stringent protective measures (coupled with strengthening of
wireless network) have been taken, apart from ecodevelopment inputs
in the specially constituted buffer zone division.
^ Top
Special
Projects
Under research and monitoring
activities, field data collection is carried out in the
specially laid out plots, as per guidelines of Project Tiger.
Daily monitoring of the endangered barasingha
population is also ensured in the prescribe format.
Cattle immunization programme in core and
buffer zones is carried out periodically.
Special Initiatives
Ecodevelopment
Integrated community development inputs have
been provided in the buffer zone under the MP Forestry Project.
Ecodevelopmental inputs have been provided to some peripheral
villages. The important components have been:
|
1. |
Protection, regeneration and
increased productivity of the forest resources of the
peripheral area for fodder, fuel wood, timber and MFP, apart
from a greater security of access to these resources for the
villagers through the development of participatory management
|
|
2. |
Fostering activities related to
the use of non-forest resources for income generation.
|
|
3. |
Promoting activities to cover the
interface between forest and other
sectors. |
Ecodevelopment
Committees
There are 106 EDCs in the buffer and 25 in the
core zone involved in various ecodevelopmental initiatives with the
Reserve Management.
Protection Squads / Patrolling
Apart from regular patrolling by different
level of field staff and officers, two strike forces have been
created with vehicular mobility to reinforce protection of the
Reserve.
Education and
Awareness
The spearhead team has been imparting the
necessary skill to other frontline staff of
the
buffer zone division for site-specific micro-planning. Further, the
team frequently convenes village level meetings for promoting
awareness amongst the local inhabitants, apart from carrying out
meaningful interpretation of PA values.
^ Top
Constraints
Human population
There are 18 forest villages in the core and 29
forest villages and 149 revenue villages in the buffer collectively
having a human population of around 1 lakh.
Livestock population
There are about 30,000 cattle heads in the
forest villages of the core zone. The total pressure is of around
80,000 cattle heads in the Reserve.
Grazing
There is complete control over grazing by
cattle in the core i.e. National Park. In the Buffer specific areas
have been earmarked for grazing by the cattle of forest / revenue
villages under effective grazing schemes.
Fire
On the basis of an effective fire scheme fire
incidence are kept at minimum by preventive and control measures.
|
Year
|
No.of Incidents
|
Area Brunt
(H.a) |
% of area
affected |
| |
|
|
|
| 1990-91 |
|
|
|
| 1991-92 |
|
|
|
| 1992-93 |
|
|
|
| 1993-94 |
|
|
|
| 1994-95 |
|
|
|
| 1995-96 |
|
|
|
| 1996-97 |
|
|
|
| 1997-98 |
|
|
|
| 1998-99 |
|
|
|
Poaching of fauna and flora
There is no poaching on commercial scale in the
Reserve, nor is there any timber maffia operating on the periphery
of the reserve. Sporadic cases of subsistence poaching and illicit
cutting of poles by indigenous people for their use takes place
which are dealt with strictly.
Poaching cases detected/seized by the Park
Management
(within and outside the jurisdiction)
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
Tiger |
Panther |
Chital |
Sambar |
Other |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1972 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
1973 |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
3 |
|
1974 |
- |
- |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
1975 |
1 |
- |
- |
- |
4 |
|
1976 |
- |
3 |
3 |
- |
3 |
|
1977 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
|
1978 |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
2 |
|
1979 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
3 |
|
1980 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
9 |
|
1981 |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
5 |
|
1982 |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
- |
|
1983 |
- |
- |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
1984 |
- |
- |
2 |
- |
4 |
|
1985 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
1986 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
1987 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|
1988 |
- |
- |
2 |
1 |
- |
|
1989 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
|
1990 |
- |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
1991 |
- |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
|
1992 |
3 |
7 |
4 |
2 |
4 |
|
1993 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
- |
|
1994 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
3 |
3 |
|
1995 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
|
1996 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
|
1997 |
- |
3 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
1998 |
- |
1 |
1 |
- |
2 |
Criminals and
Extremists
Though there are no criminals and extremists in
the real sense of the terms but there is no dearth of the so-called
custodians and social activists opposing government policies for the
eco-upliftment of the villagers.
Diseases
During 1976, there was an outbreak of
rinderpest. In all 52 Gaur, 8 Sambar and 35 Chital succumbed to the
disease. Due to the large population of cattle in the surrounding
villages, outbreak of infectious diseases in the Reserve area is
always feared.
The sal borer (Hoplocerambyx
spinicornis) infestation has been notified in Kanha National Park
(Core Zone) in a sporadic manner.
Problems
False propaganda about the newly constituted
buffer zone division by self-styled women social activists and
eco-illiterate carving for recognition.
Lack of special statutory protection to field
staff for acts done in good faith while discharging their duties,
and delayed judicial proceedings.
Lack of a special statutory body / authority /
legal support for integrated regional community development planning
in the buffer zone.
Fragmentation of vegetal connectivity linking
the Tiger Reserve to their PAs owing to biotic pressure.
Ground frost at times hampers regeneration of
plant species.
Mining
The Hidusthan Copper Ltd. (around 7 km beyond
the buffer boundary).
Irrigation
Matiari Project (around 1 km. away from the
buffer boundary).
Control of the
Buffer
Buffer is under the unified control of the
management of the Reserve
^ Top
Conflicts
Man-Animal
There are occasional man-animal conflicts -
viz., crop-raiding, cattle lifting, human injury, loss of life
etc.
^ Top
Action Points
|
1. |
Publicity work through traditional
folk dances, skits, workshops are proving quite effective and
need to be continued. |
|
2. |
Motivating school teachers to
elicit support of younger generation. |
|
3. |
Self-styled NGIs/NGOs craving for
recognition by misleading the masses at the cost of the Kanha
need to be black listed. |
|
4. |
Dedicated NGIs/NGOs are to be
involved in mobile seminars designed for the indigenous
people. |
|
5. |
Viable strategy for conservating
the available forests to ensure vegetal connectivity with the
core. |
|
6. |
Legislative support is extremely
important for avoiding conflict between conservation and
economic optimisation of use of resource in the buffer area.
This legislation should prevail over other conflicting
legislations, ensure sectoral integration and streamline the
planning process for public
participation. |
Back